Tag: strategic planning

Derek’s Blog, launched in 2003, serves as a platform for sharing thoughts and reflections related to his work. It offers over 20 years of searchable posts, categorized by the tags below. Feel free to comment, as your feedback contributes to ongoing reflection and future posts.

Like riding a bike

Image: created using Gemini

Learning to ride a bike was pretty much a right of passage when I was growing up. In a time before there were SUVs transporting kids to school or sports events on Saturday, your bike was essential for getting you from A to B on a daily basis, so learning to ride well and safely at an early age was extremely important.

I can recall my mother spending time holding on to the carrier on the rear of my bike as I gradually got the ‘feel’ of holding my balance and then using the pedals. I can remember also the jubilation (for both of us) when, finally, I was able to pedal down our drive without her holding on, running to keep up!

The real turning point for me in becoming a more competent rider occurred just a few months after that, when a traffic officer visited our school and we were instructed to collect our bikes from the stands behind the school and bring them to the netball courts. Our whole class lined up, bikes of many different colours and types, some even had saddle bags strapped to the carriers which were the envy of the rest of us.

The traffic officer explained that he was going to see how well we could ride, and give us some tips on how we could become better riders. This started with the whole class mounting up and riding around the perimeter of the netball court. This provided some level of consternation for some and hilarity for others as 30 kids all jostled for position in the paloton (I didn’t know the meaning of that word then 🙂 and endeavoured to make their way around the perimeter without bumping into others or falling off at the turn.

On arriving back where the officer stood were were asked how we felt about that. Some felt OK, others said they felt ‘wobbly’ while yet others said it was difficult to avoid bumping into others and so on.

The officer then said he had his next challenge for us. He lined us up at one end of the court, and one-by-one, invited us to cycle to the other end of the court, following one of the lines painted on the court as a guide. He then emphasised that he’d be judging our performance by how well we kept our cycle on the line throughout the journey to the other end.

One-by-one we completed the task, with very few being able to keep their cycle on the line all the way – most of us simply veered from one side to the other for the whole journey – travelling so very slowly as we concentrated on the line in front of our wheel.

Assembled back again after that challenge we were again asked how we’d felt doing it. No-one felt confident, many argued it was too difficult.

This is when the office shared his ‘secret’ for doing it well. He told us we’d be doing the same thing again – but this time, instead of looking down at our front wheel as we tried to keep on the line, we were to fix our eyes on a spot in the distance beyond where the line stopped, and to keep cycling with our eyes on that spot. As each class member took their turn, the rest of us were asked to keep a close watch on the bike tyres to see how closely they stayed on the line (or not).

To begin we were clearly skeptical, with some of the class complaining that made it difficult for them to actually get started and know where the line ways. As each class member took their turn, however, the mood changed and we were amazed at how close to the line pretty much everyone was now able to travel.

The memory of that lesson has remained with me ever since – and I’ve used that strategy when teaching my own kids how to ride – and then my grand-kids. I’ve also used it as a metaphor in much of my work with school leaders to help explain the importance of having a vision and mission to guide you – the vision being the point beyond the end of the line, and the mission being to get there by staying on the line the whole way in the example of the cycling lesson.

The key point to note in this story is that the office wasn’t trying to teach us how to ride a bike. Most of us know how to do that already. He was teaching us how to ride with direction and purpose.

There are some clear parallels in this story for how we approach leadership.

The line represents the pathway or mission that keeps us moving towards our destination, and the rider is the person or organisation making continual adjustments along the way. When we remain focused on the front wheel and the line we are concentrating on immediate performance. When we look to the horizon while riding we are more likely to maintain direction and purpose.

The important lesson we all learned that day, and the lesson for us as educators was looking at the line actually made it harder to stay on the line.

When organisations become so focused on what is immediately in front of them that they lose sight of where they’re actually going, and can so easily veer off course in terms of their vision and mission – just like we did as young riders. The ‘line’ we are being challenged to follow currently can be identified by listening to conversations we are having in staff-rooms and professional meetings – things like What do we need to implement? What does the Ministry require? Have we completed the documentation? Have our teachers been trained? Are we meeting the deadline? Have we ticked the box?

These are all legitimate concerns – but are all ‘front wheel’ questions. The more important question is; Is what we’re doing taking us towards the kind of learners – and the kind of society – we say we are preparing for?

The problem isn’t about compliance – it’s about compliance without direction. In my cycling lesson metaphor above we were all asked to comply with a simple instruction – to follow the line, which we did, but without really focusing also on the direction we were headed. There wasn’t anything particularly wrong with the instruction – in fact, it is very helpful to be able to cycle in a straight line and avoid appearing unsteady on the road as it provides confidence for the other road users who we may pass or who may pass us!

My point here is that externally mandated change mustn’t be thought of as inherently bad. Some mandated changes may be worthwhile and necessary. The danger comes from when we blindly implement the change. An organisation can become very good at responding to whatever appears immediately in front of it while gradually drifting away from its own purpose.

This is something that is concerning me a lot at the current time when schools are faced with so much mandated change, and I see a lot of ‘front wheel’ thinking and acting taking place in response.

This is where a school’s vision becomes so important. Even more important when it has been co-constructed with the community and is owned by staff and embraced within the culture of the school.

It’s important to emphasise here that a vision shouldn’t simply describe a desirable future. It should orient decisions in the present. So when something new comes along – new policy, curriculum requirements, assessment expectations, technology, accountability measures, initiatives etc. – the question isn’t simply “How do we implement this?” It is: “How does this help us get closer to where we say we’re going?” That changes the role of vision from something purely aspirational to something that connects genuinely with the operational life of the school.

Which brings me to the role of leadership. Leadership is about keeping eyes on the horizon – and helping others do the same. A leader can’t continually steer an organisation by making every decision personally. The organisation needs a culture in which people at every level understand the destination well enough to make good decisions about the next step. That means that everyone in the school community needs to know where are we going? Why are we going there? What matters most along the way? How will we know whether we’re still on course? What should we do when something pulls us away from that direction?

The leader’s job isn’t to keep everyone’s front wheel perfectly aligned. It’s to make sure everyone knows what they’re riding towards.

On reflecting on my cycling lesson I need to acknowledge, however, that the line painted on the netball court was unusually simple. Real organisational journeys aren’t. There will be obstacles. Detours. Unexpected events. Changing circumstances. Sometimes the path itself needs to change. And that’s precisely why you need the horizon. If circumstances require you to leave the original line, you can still make intelligent decisions because you know where you’re trying to go. This is particularly relevant to education leaders operating in uncertainty as we appear to be currently.

If schools say their purpose is to prepare young people for a future that is uncertain, complex and changing, what happens when the adults in those schools become entirely preoccupied with responding to today’s requirements? There is an inherent irony here – we can become so busy preparing students for the future that we lose sight of the future we’re preparing them for.

The danger isn’t that we fail to keep up with change. The danger is that we become so focused on keeping up with change that we forget what we’re changing for.

When I think of my cycle lesson experience, the traffic officer didn’t tell us to stop looking at the road. He taught us to look beyond the road while still attending to it. This applies to the work we do in schools. We can’t ignore the front wheel. Leaders still have to deal with the policies, requirements, deadlines, resources and practicalities immediately in front of them. But we shouldn’t confuse paying attention to the front wheel with knowing where we’re going.

As school leaders it is important to keep your eyes on the horizon. Make the adjustments you need to make. Stay attentive to the road beneath you. But never let the demands of the journey cause you to forget the destination. Otherwise you’ll end up like so many of my classmates on that day, wobbling all over the place, some falling off and very few reaching the other end having stayed on the line at all.

The challenge I’ve outlined above isn’t new, and is something that I’ve worked with many schools, school leaders and boards of trustees to address. Here are some practical ideas you might consider to ensure you are focused on the horizon, and not simply the front wheel:

  1. Revisit your vision – not just your wording.
    When was the last time your leadership team, staff, board and wider community genuinely talked about what your vision means for the decisions you are making today? Is it still the destination you are collectively heading towards, or has it become something displayed on walls and websites rather than used to guide action?
  2. Put every major change through the “horizon test”.
    When a new mandate, policy or initiative arrives, don’t begin only with “What do we have to do?” Ask also: “How does this take us towards our vision?”
    And, importantly, “What might we need to stop, adapt or challenge if it doesn’t?
  3. Turn your vision into an operational tool.
    Use it in staff meetings, professional learning, strategic planning, appraisal, board discussions and conversations about resourcing. Make the vision part of the questions you routinely ask rather than something you refer to occasionally.
  4. Talk with your people about the horizon.
    Ask staff, students, whānau and trustees:
    What are we trying to achieve for our learners?
    What does our vision ask of us in the way we teach and lead?
    Are the changes currently occupying our attention helping us get there?
    Where might we be in danger of losing sight of the destination?
  5. Give people permission to keep looking up.
    Perhaps this is the most important leadership task of all. In times of rapid change, people can become so absorbed in implementing what is immediately required that there is little time or permission to step back and ask whether it is taking the organisation in the right direction.

So, perhaps the challenge for school leaders right now isn’t simply to manage the changes coming at us. It is to keep our eyes on the horizon while doing so. Know what you’re being asked to do. Understand why it matters. Make the necessary adjustments. But continually ask: Is this taking us where we say we want to go? Because the purpose of leadership isn’t to keep everyone’s front wheel perfectly aligned. It’s to ensure that, together, we know where we’re heading.

The ideologies shaping our classrooms

Much of my work over the past few years has been in support of school leadership teams and boards of trustees as they review and develop their strategic plans. Typically, this involves a process of seeking feedback from students, teachers and parents/whānau as we work together to review the school’s vision and values and the beliefs that underpin these to ensure there is alignment of thinking in terms of the decisions we make. While this process has always provided an opportunity to identify and work with the diversity of views that people bring to the table, in recent years I’ve found this to be an increasingly challenging thing to do well – significantly because of how entrenched some of these beliefs about learning and the purpose of education are that emerge from these discussions. This seems particularly true at the moment as we face an increasing level of mandated change in our education system, much of which challenges the underlying beliefs and assumptions of many educators and their communities. In this post I thought I’d share some thoughts about this tension and what we can do to address it.

This question is fundamental to all of the debates we have in education a the moment, and links strongly to my previous series of posts on Why Schools Lose Their Capacity to Learn.

Aotearoa New Zealand’s educational history is really a succession of overlapping answers to three questions:

  • What is worth knowing?
  • What kind of person should schooling produce?
  • What kind of society and economy should schooling serve?

We’ve moved, over the decades, from asking what learners should know, to asking what they should be able to do, to asking who they might become. But no era has ever fully replaced the one before it. I believe that contemporary education has to hold all three questions at once – and that’s precisely why the system feels so contested right now.

Walk into almost any staffroom, curriculum meeting or ERO review and you’ll find several ideologies operating simultaneously, often unacknowledged and sometimes in open tension:

  • a liberal expectation that students become responsible, informed citizens;
  • a scholar-academic expectation that they master disciplinary knowledge;
  • a progressive commitment to inquiry, experience and the interests of the learner;
  • a social-efficiency demand for measurable progress and qualifications;
  • a constructivist view of learners as active meaning-makers;
  • a relational and culturally responsive commitment to identity, belonging and community;
  • a neoliberal or managerial pressure to demonstrate performance through data.

None of these is new, and none of them is going away. What’s changed is the balance of power between them – and right now, two are pulling hardest against each other.

Strip away the jargon and the current tension in our system comes down to a single, deceptively simple contrast – one I’ve attempted to sketch out in the illustration below that contrasts Learning as Knowing against Learning as Becoming.

This image shows two ideologies, side by side: the Knowing classroom optimised for control, performance and compliance; the Becoming classroom optimised for trust, purpose and possibility. Most schools live somewhere between the two – the question is which one is currently winning.

Learning as Knowing treats knowledge as the primary product of education. Success is what you can recall and reproduce. Intelligence is conceived largely in academic and cognitive terms. Curriculum is something to be covered. The learner is, to a significant degree, a recipient. Its risk is inert knowledge – content transmitted but never metabolised – and it leaves an uncomfortable question hanging: who authorises the knowledge of the school?

Learning as Becoming treats knowledge as a means to human development and possibility. Success is what you can do, create, contribute and become. Intelligence is understood holistically. Curriculum is something to be experienced, explored and applied. The learner is an active agent in their own development. Its risk is the mirror image of the first – vague capability or identity-talk untethered from any real knowledge – and it carries its own hard question: whose values, history and knowledge inform this vision, and whose future is it building toward?

Put visually, the contrast sharpens further: one side organised around control, performance and compliance – timetables, test scores, report cards, a teacher at the front converting facts into grades; the other organised around trust, purpose and possibility – collaborative, holistic, oriented toward wellbeing and belonging as much as achievement.

It’s a genuinely useful distinction. It’s also, I want to be careful to say, a caricature if left there.

The temptation, once you’ve drawn a contrast this clean, is to pick a side. We must resist that. “Learning as knowing” and “learning as becoming” are best treated as ideal types – useful for diagnosis, dangerous as a menu. The enduring truth is that becoming always requires something to become through: knowledge, practices, relationships, languages, histories, participation. Strip knowledge out in pursuit of capability and dispositions, and you’re left with confidence built on nothing. Strip becoming out in pursuit of coverage and measurement, and you’re left with content that never becomes anyone’s own.

This is where I think the strongest position sits – not as a compromise, but as a genuine synthesis: learning as knowing-and-becoming. Learners become through knowing, and what they know is transformed by how they participate, interpret and act. That formulation avoids two reductions at once. It refuses to treat education as the delivery of decontextualised content. But it equally refuses to treat learning as a set of dispositions, competencies or identities that can be developed independently of powerful knowledge.

This isn’t an abstract argument. It’s the argument sitting underneath a very live conversation I’ve been found myself having with colleagues recently: are we measuring what’s important?

It’s worth being clear here that assessment never moves alone – it’s one point in a curriculum–pedagogy–assessment nexus, and none of the three can really be understood in isolation from the other two. Right now in Aotearoa New Zealand, all three are shifting together: a more tightly specified, knowledge-rich curriculum; a pedagogical push toward explicit teaching, with structured, time-boxed instruction (an hour a day) mandated for foundational literacy and numeracy; and a move toward standards-based assessment to check whether it’s landing. Taken as a package, this is a coherent, deliberate Learning-as-Knowing response to a real and legitimate concern – that too much was left implicit, too much depended on which school or which teacher you happened to get, and too little was actually being checked. That’s a fair critique of a system that had drifted too far toward Becoming without enough scaffolding underneath it.

But a nexus that tightens in the same direction on all three fronts is exactly where the risk of reduction is greatest – and assessment is where it bites hardest, because assessment is what ultimately defines “success” for everyone in the system. If what gets measured is only what’s easiest to test – recall, procedural fluency, coverage – then curriculum specification and explicit pedagogy, however well-intentioned, will quietly narrow to serve that measure. We’ll have specified the knowledge beautifully, taught it explicitly and consistently, and still failed to ask whether learners can do anything with it, become anything through it, or see themselves and their communities reflected in it. Measuring only the Knowing side of the ledger doesn’t just under-value Becoming – over time it erodes the very engagement and sense of purpose that makes deep knowledge stick in the first place.

The task in front of the sector isn’t to pick knowing or becoming, and it certainly isn’t to let an assessment regime built for one silently pull curriculum and pedagogy intentions built for both back toward it. It’s to ask, of every assessment decision: does this let us see knowing and becoming – content mastered and what it enabled a learner to do, create, contribute and become? If the answer is no, we’re not measuring what’s important. We’re just measuring what’s convenient.

None of this gets resolved by a blog post – it gets tested in practice, in the daily decisions teachers and leaders make about what to teach, how to teach it, and what counts as evidence that it’s worked. If you’re using this as a starting point for a PD session or a professional inquiry, here are some questions worth putting on the table.

For teachers, on practice:

  • When I look at what I actually spend assessment time on, is it weighted toward what’s easy to check, or what’s important?
  • Where in my programme does a learner get to show what they can do, create or contribute – not just what they can recall?
  • Is there a foundational skill I teach explicitly that learners never get to apply to something that matters to them? What would it take to close that gap?
  • If a learner from my class could only be judged on one piece of evidence from this term, would it show knowing, becoming, or both?

For leaders, on system and culture:

  • Look across our school’s assessment schedule – does it, as a whole, make becoming visible, or only knowing?
  • Where are curriculum, pedagogy and assessment pulling in the same direction in our school, and where are they quietly working against each other?
  • What message are we sending – through timetabling, reporting formats, or what we celebrate – about which ideology we actually value, regardless of what our documents say?
  • If an ERO reviewer, a parent and a Year 9 student each described “success” at our school, would their answers agree?

For both, together:

  • What would we have to stop measuring, or start measuring, to genuinely capture knowing-and-becoming rather than one at the expense of the other?
  • Whose knowledge, values and vision of the future are embedded in what we currently teach and test – and whose are missing?

These aren’t questions with tidy answers. But asking them together, as a staff, is a reasonable place to start putting knowing-and-becoming into practice rather than leaving it as an idea on a page.

Blog posts

Thought Pieces

Lessons on strategy from riding a bike

Photo by Dovile Ramoskaite on Unsplash

“Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving”

Albert Einstein

Riding a bike is something I’ve been doing since I was very young. It’s still something I do by choice to simply get around the place when the weather and time permit, and I enjoy it as a way of getting exercise by taking long rides along the river trails or, occasionally, up the hills around where I live.

As I was out on my bike yesterday my mind wandered back to when I learned to ride, and some of the lessons that enabled me to finally achieve my goal. As I was navigating my way along a rough part of the riverbank journey, I reflected on the turbulence we’re all experiencing at the moment, particularly in our education system, and how those simple lessons from learning to ride a bike may be useful to us now.

Here are just a couple of those lessons together with some implications for how we might use these lessons to inform our approach as leaders…

LESSON 1: Keep your eyes up and always look ahead instead of down

The first piece of advice I recall which, at the time seemed counter-intuitive, but in the long run proved really effective. I was trying so hard to focus on keeping my balance and ride in a straight line, my eyes fixed completely on the front wheel and my hands making repeated adjustments to the direction of travel as the wheel swerved one way then the other. No matter how hard I tried I never seemed to be able to stay ‘true’ to the line I was trying to follow.

It was my mother, patiently standing behind me on my bike, who suggested that, instead of focusing on the wheel in front of me, I fix my gaze on the point ahead – the place I was intending to travel to. Despite initially thinking that was a crazy idea, and that I’d lose the focus on my wheel and where I needed to steer, I followed his advice.

The change was instantaneous! Instead of swerving all over the place as a result of the constantly ‘over-compensating’ movement of the handlebars, I was able to ride with more confidence in a straight line towards the place I was looking ahead to.

It’s a lesson that’s stuck with me as I’ve continued to “ride my bike” through my life – but has also resonated as a key life lesson when it comes to pursuing my goals and longer term objectives – and for those in leadership, charged with helping ‘steer the organisational bike’ if you like.

As individuals it is very easy to become focused on the wheel in front of us, instead of holding our head up and keeping eyes fixed on the road ahead. This is particularly true when we’re faced with uncertainty and disruption such as we’re all facing currently. It brings about a sense of panic, an urgency of focus on the ‘now’, driven by the demands of the seemingly insurmountable problems threatening the basis of the things that familiar to us and within which we are able to operate with comfort.

I’ve recognised this in many settings recently – from school settings where principals and staff are so busy focusing on ’emergency measures’ that they no longer have time any the ‘big picture’ or strategic thinking, through to our political leaders calling for a time to ‘take stock’ and allow time for some relief from the relentless pressures we’re facing.

All of this I completely understand. There’s a feeling of exhaustion across almost every part of our society at present – so it makes sense to create space for our wellbeing and ensure we take time to care for ourselves and those around us.

But we can’t afford to ride the bike for long by simply looking at the front wheel as sooner or later we’ll find ourselves becoming incredibly wobbly, over-compensating when obstacles appear unexpectedly and eventually falling over because we’ve become completely un-balanced.

This is where leaders need to step up and ensure they have their eyes fixed firmly on the road ahead, and that they convey a sense of purpose, direction and hope in those who are with them on the journey, even if at the time the only focus those people can have is the wheel before them.

Just like learning to ride a bike, lifting your head to view the road ahead when everything in your being is telling you to look down at the wheel can be a challenging exercise – but it is so important! And for the experienced cyclist, looking to the road ahead is common practice, and the thought of looking down at the front tyre as you ride an act inviting almost certain disaster.

So… just like the youngster learning to ride a bike, we have to overcome the tendency to absorb our minds with a focus on the front wheel. With our head up and a clear-ish picture of the road ahead, we’re in a far better position to anticipate the corners, potholes and stones on the road, and our reflexes will ensure the front wheel is turned just enough to navigate through or around these things, and not veer so wildly that we’re thrown off balance and fall off.

LESSON 2: The physics of cycling makes it easier to stay upright when you’re going faster

In the process of learning to ride a bike there is a certain point where you realise how fruitless it is to keep trying to get onto the saddle, grip the handlebars and place feet on the pedals before starting to move forward. I still have memories of my own experience in learning to ride, over and over I persisted in trying to first get myself positioned on the saddle with everything in place before starting to move forward. Like lesson #1, this seems counter-intuitive, but the fact is that the forward motion is actually what enables us to find our balance and succeed in maintaining the appropriate posture for riding. Without the forward momentum we’ll inevitably fall over.

Further, as we experience the success of doing this, and as our confidence grows, we discover that the faster we go, the more control we actually have to navigate the sudden twists and turns or rugged terrain we’re travelling on. Of course, there’s a limit to just how fast you can go which correlates directly to the amount of experience and confidence you have gained.

From a strategic perspective, speed isn’t about being hasty and progressing with reckless abandonment, it’s about having the thinking, processes and systems in place that allow your organisation to progress with speed, while at the same time allowing time for reflection, relaxation and recovery along the way.

It’s these things that provide the forward momentum in any organisation and ensure it is travelling forward rather than slowing down – which so often occurs during times of disruption and the uncertainty that this causes.

Without the confidence the members of an orgnisation have in their collective vision and the processes, systems and structures that support that, eyes will inevitably focus more on the front wheel than on the horizon.

The point here is that strategic speed isn’t about reckless abandonment and going flat out – think more about a long distance cycle race than a downhill mountain bike event. It’s about having the things in place that will ensure strategic speed – the momentum toward strategic goals – is maintained, instead of wearing everyone in the organisation out by trying simply to peddle faster!

Back in 2010, Jocelyn R. Davis and Tom Atkinson wrote in the Harvard Business Review an article titled Need Speed? Slow Down, which captures a lot of this thinking really well in my view. They include a useful table that compares strategically fast organisations with strategically slow ones as shown below:

From Need Speed? Slow Down by Davis and Atkinson

The study by Davis and Atkinson revealed that..

..higher-performing companies with strategic speed made alignment a priority. They became more open to ideas and discussion. They encouraged innovative thinking. And they allowed time to reflect and learn. By contrast, performance suffered at firms that moved fast all the time, focused too much on maximizing efficiency, stuck to tested methods, didn’t foster employee collaboration, and weren’t overly concerned about alignment.

From Need Speed Slow Down by Jocelyn R. Davis and Tom Atkinson

This is the challenge I see facing education leaders in the current milieu. Instead of hunkering down and focusing on using tested methods (which haven’t worked in the past, so why should they suddenly provide results now?) we need to foster a climate of experimentation, exploration, reflection etc. – all of which is undergirded by a collective commitment to strategic direction and purpose.

Just like in a team cycling event, it’s the longer term goal that is always in sight, and this, in turn, enables decisions made along the way that ensure the speed towards that goal can be achieved. In other words – eyes up instead of on the front wheel.

What others say

The Learning Environments Australasia Executive Committee  has received a lot of positive feedback, which is greatly due to your wealth of knowledge and information you imparted on our large audience, your presentation has inspired a range of educators, architects and facility planners and for this we are grateful.

Daniel Smith Chair Learning Environments Australasia

Derek and Maurie complement each other well and have the same drive and passion for a future education system that is so worthwhile being part of. Their presentation and facilitation is at the same time friendly and personal while still incredibly professional. I am truly grateful to have had this experience alongside amazing passionate educators and am inspired to re visit all aspects of my leadership. I have a renewed passion for our work as educational leaders.

Karyn Gray Principal, Raphael House Rudolf Steiner

I was in desperate need of a programme like this. This gave me the opportunity to participate in a transformative journey of professional learning and wellbeing, where I rediscovered my passion, reignited my purpose, and reconnected with my vision for leading in education. Together, we got to nurture not just academic excellence, but also the holistic wellbeing of our school communities. Because when we thrive, so does the entire educational ecosystem.

Tara Quinney Principal, St Peter's College, Gore

Refresh, Reconnect, Refocus is the perfect title for this professional development. It does just that. A fantastic retreat, space to think, relax and start to reconnect. Derek and Maurie deliver a balance of knowledge and questioning that gives you time to think about your leadership and where to next. Both facilitators have the experience, understanding, connection and passion for education, this has inspired me to really look at the why for me!

Jan McDonald Principal, Birkdale North School

Engaged, passionate, well informed facilitators who seamlessly worked together to deliver and outstanding programme of thought provoking leadership learning.

Dyane Stokes Principal, Paparoa Street School

A useful and timely call to action. A great chance to slow down, reflect on what really drives you, and refocus on how to get there. Wonderful conversations, great connections, positive pathways forward.

Ursula Cunningham Principal, Amesbury School

RRR is a standout for quality professional learning for Principals. Having been an education PLD junkie for 40 years I have never before attended a programme that has challenged me as much because of its rigor, has satisfied me as much because of its depth or excited me as much because of realising my capacity to lead change. Derek and Maurie are truly inspiring pedagogical, authentic leadership experts who generously and expertly share their passion, wisdom and skills to help Principal's to focus on what is important in schools and be the best leader they can be.

Cindy Sullivan Principal, Kaipara College

Derek Wenmoth is brilliant. Derek connects powerful ideas forecasting the future of learning to re-imagine education and create resources for future-focused practices and policies to drive change. His work provides guidance and tools for shifting to new learning ecosystems through innovations with a focus on purpose, equity, learner agency, and lifelong learning. His work is comprehensive and brings together research and best practices to advance the future of teaching and learning.  His passion, commitment to innovation for equity and the range of practical, policy and strategic advice are exceptional.

Susan Patrick, CEO, Aurora Institute

I asked Derek to work with our teachers to reenergise our team back into our journey towards our vision after the two years of being in and out of 'Covid-ness'.  Teachers reported positively about the day with Derek, commenting on how affirmed they felt that our vision is future focused.  Teachers expressed excitement with their new learning towards the vision, and I've noticed a palpable energy since the day.  Derek also started preparing our thinking for hybrid learning, helping us all to feel a sense of creativity rather than uncertainty.  The leadership team is keen to see him return!

Kate Christie | Principal | Cashmere Ave School

Derek has supported, informed and inspired a core group of our teachers to be effective leads in our college for NPDL. Derek’s PLD is expertly targeted to our needs.

Marion Lumley | Deputy Principal |Ōtaki College

What a task we set Derek -  to facilitate a shared vision and strategy with our Board and the professional and admin teams (14 of us), during a Covid lockdown, using online technology. Derek’s expertise, skilled questioning, strategic facilitation and humour enabled us to work with creative energy for 6 hours using a range of well-timed online activities. He kept us focussed on creating and achieving a shared understanding of our future strategic plan.  Derek’s future focussed skills combined with an understanding of strategy and the education sector made our follow up conversations invaluable.  Furthermore, we will definitely look to engage Derek for future strategic planning work.

Sue Vaealiki, Chair of Stonefields Collaborative Trust 

Our Principal PLG has worked with Derek several times now, and will continue to do so. Derek is essentially a master facilitator/mentor...bringing the right level of challenge, new ideas & research to deepen your thinking, but it comes with the level of support needed to feel engaged, enriched and empowered after working with him.

Gareth Sinton, Principal, Douglas Park School

Derek is a highly knowledgeable and inspirational professional learning provider that has been guiding our staff in the development of New Pedagogies’ for Deep Learning. His ability to gauge where staff are at and use this to guide next steps has been critical in seeing staff buy into this processes and have a strong desire to build in their professional practice.

Andy Fraser, Principal, Otaki College