Why Our Schools Must Keep Their Commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi

Image: Ōtaki College, used with permission

After more than 50 years in education, I’ve learned that the most powerful learning happens when children see themselves reflected in their classroom – when their language, culture, and identity are recognised and valued. This isn’t ideology; it’s reality, proven time and again in schools and communities across Aotearoa. It’s also why I’m deeply concerned about the government’s proposal to remove the requirement for school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Last week I attended the FullScale Symposium in New Orleans with two New Zealand school leaders. One is the principal of a small, multi-cultural primary school in Auckland, and the other is the deputy principal of a very large multi-cultural primary school in Hamilton. We presented one of the first workshops at the event, and my colleagues presented on how honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi shapes practice in their schools. Both colleagues shared how working with whānau to establish shared purpose has transformed engagement and achievement – living proof that giving effect to Te Tiriti isn’t an abstract policy idea but a practical pathway to success.

With this in mind I became motivated to write this post after I read this morning how the current government is proposing to remove the requirement for school boards to “give effect to” Te Tiriti o Waitangi, arguing that boards should focus on “practical things” like attendance and achievement. But here’s what concerns me: honouring Te Tiriti is one of the most practical things we can do to increase engagement and lift achievement, and more than that, to raise the aspirations of all for a future where all can thrive and experience success in life not just in learning.

Here’s what I believe “giving effect to Te Tiriti” should look like in our schools. It’s not complicated bureaucracy – it’s about ensuring every child succeeds. It means:

  • Making sure Māori students achieve at the same levels as their peers
  • Including local tikanga and mātauranga in what and how we teach
  • Offering opportunities to learn te reo Māori
  • Consulting with whānau and local iwi when making important decisions
  • Creating environments where all students feel they belong

These aren’t additional burdens on boards – they’re core responsibilities of good governance that benefit all students, not just Māori learners.

Here are four key arguments that occur to me as I reflect on this situation this morning…

Te Tiriti o Waitangi isn’t just another historical event to memorise alongside other historical events such as the Battle of Hastings. It’s our nation’s founding document. It’s a living agreement that continues to shape our laws, our society, and our relationships today. Unlike historical events that have concluded, Te Tiriti remains legally and morally binding.

When our forebears signed this agreement in 1840, the Crown made promises: to protect Māori rights and taonga (including language and knowledge systems), to enable Māori to make decisions about their affairs, and to ensure equal rights and privileges for all. For generations, we failed to honour these promises. The Education and Training Act 2020 was an attempt to finally make good on this commitment within our education system.

The government now argues that Te Tiriti obligations “rightfully sit with the Crown,” not with school boards. But school boards are Crown entities. They govern Crown institutions. If schools don’t honour this agreement, who will? And besides, surely creating the conditions where the Treaty is honoured by all citizens is a strategically sensible thing for the Crown to do in order to discharge its responsibilities in the first place?

The recently revised “knowledge rich” curriculum compounds this concern by positioning Te Tiriti alongside Greek civilisations, early explorers, and global migration stories – all examples of “cultural diversity” that students might explore. While students will learn about various cultures through activities reflecting “diverse cultural contexts,” this approach fundamentally misunderstands what Te Tiriti represents.

Te Tiriti is not simply another example of cultural diversity or multicultural awareness – it is the constitutional foundation of our nation. Treating it as just one cultural perspective among many, equivalent to learning about ancient Greece or Chinese dynasties, strips it of its unique legal standing and ongoing relevance.

This isn’t about celebrating cultural differences – important as that is. This is about honouring a solemn agreement that gives our government its legitimacy to govern. When we reduce Te Tiriti to a topic students might encounter while developing “key competencies” around cultural diversity, we’re abandoning our constitutional responsibility and telling Māori students and whānau that their place in our national story is optional, negotiable, disposable.

Over decades of working alongside schools with significant Māori student populations, I’ve seen the generational impact of colonisation: the loss of language, identity, and culture. I’ve also seen what happens when we get it right.

When children see their culture reflected and valued in their learning environment, something remarkable happens. Their engagement increases. Their confidence grows. They participate more actively because the learning matters to them personally. Research consistently shows that students with strong cultural identity perform better academically, have better mental health, and develop greater resilience.

But the impact extends far beyond individual students. When schools genuinely affirm Māori language and culture, the benefits ripple through entire whānau and communities. I’ve witnessed parents and grandparents reconnect with te reo and tikanga they’d lost through their own schooling experiences. When children come home speaking te reo, sharing cultural knowledge, and feeling proud of their heritage, it creates healing across generations. Whānau who’ve carried the pain of having their language and culture dismissed or punished in schools begin to reclaim what was taken. This strengthening of cultural identity within families and communities has profound downstream effects on social cohesion, mental health, and community wellbeing.

This isn’t just about Māori students and whānau either. When schools embrace cultural diversity and create truly inclusive environments, all students benefit. They develop empathy, critical thinking, and the cultural competence needed to thrive in our diverse nation and interconnected world.

The government is claiming the 2020 Treaty clause “made no difference to raising the achievement of tamariki Māori.” I understand the desire for evidence of impact, but in my view four years is hardly sufficient time to evaluate systemic change in education, where transformation takes generations. More importantly, I challenge this assertion based on the context-specific evidence I’ve witnessed personally in schools that have genuinely embraced these principles.

We know what works! When Māori have genuine agency in educational decision-making, when their language and culture are reflected in their learning, when they’re free from discrimination, when whānau are actively involved – achievement improves. These conditions align precisely with what giving effect to Te Tiriti requires.

Our school boards don’t need less responsibility for Te Tiriti – they need better support to fulfil this vital obligation. The solution to implementation challenges isn’t to abandon our founding principles; it’s to provide clearer guidance, better resources, and stronger partnerships.

For the sake of all our children – Māori and non-Māori alike – we must maintain this commitment. Their success, and our nation’s future, depends on it.

To conclude, I need to acknowledge something important here. As a Pākehā male, my five decades in education haven’t just been about witnessing change in others – the students and communities – they’ve been about profound change within myself. Working alongside some amazing Māori educators, whānau, and communities has fundamentally shifted my thinking, challenged my assumptions, deepened my understanding, and transformed how I work. Learning to truly honour Te Tiriti has made me a better educator, a better leader, and a better person. This journey of growth and understanding is available to all of us, but only if we’re willing to stay committed to the partnership Te Tiriti established.

Walking away from this obligation doesn’t just harm Māori communities – it impoverishes us all by denying us the opportunity to grow into the nation we promised to become together.

By wenmothd

Derek is regarded as one of NZ education’s foremost Future Focused thinkers, and is regularly asked to consult with schools, policy makers and government agencies regarding the future directions of NZ educational policy and practice.

4 replies on “Why Our Schools Must Keep Their Commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi”

Thank you Derek for your 4 key points and their explanation. I agree with you absolutely and find myself impacted by their thinking.
There may be other view points that could be made to bring your argument more closely on topic but from my view you have said enough!!!
Walking away from this obligation is as you have noted, a particularly important outcome that New Zealand has made in building our country as a biculturally focused and collective network where Te Triti must be considered as a National expectation and not a set of objectives that can be followed if we wish to.

Ngā mihi nui e hoa

Nick Billowes.

Kia ora Derek, thanks again for articulating the central kaupapa for why educators and leaders are responding in the way they are to these ‘reforms’. After commenting on your ‘Populism’ post I went away and took those lessons and posted it to LinkedIn, to create a conversation in response to Seymour and it was actually quite eye opening. The most engagement I have had on the platform.

I learned so much about the ‘other side’, the term ‘cultural agnosticism’ was mooted. Which would be impossible to achieve as we would just regress to the majority culture. What it taught me though was that the discussion was about the most effective mechanisms to achieve a truly diverse and successful education system and ensuring the design of the system serves every child.

It makes me wonder if we would debate a civil engineer if we all agreed that a bridge needed to be built. Without being pompous or arrogant, I would love to see the day where we agreed on the outcome (a clear why as a country for education, similar to Singapore) and trusted the sector (educators and MOE) to develop the how, and then as leaders we were held accountable to the outcome. If that bridge failed it would be the engineers responsibility, but it wouldn’t remove the need that was identified in the first place.

thanks for your response here Andy, I completely agree about the need to establish the clear ‘why’. We seem to be all over the place about the purpose of education as a nation.

“After more than 50 years in education, I’ve learned that the most powerful learning happens when children see themselves reflected in their classroom – when their language, culture, and identity are recognised and valued. This isn’t ideology; it’s reality, proven time and again in schools and communities across Aotearoa.” Given your views expressed above how does your rhetoric on Te Tiriti apply to schools where children from one or more immigrant cultures out number Maori children? Is the school allowed to adapt to the actual cultures of the parents in the school? Also why do you believe that all Maori children have the same culture? Given that being Maori means anyone with any Maori lineage why would you expect that cohort to embrace a homogenous cultural outlook? Is culture not a dynamic thing? Assuming so how can a school possibly reflect a culture and all it’s variants within its school structure? Or is this about embracing a mythical primitive cultural worldview rather than a dynamic realistic worldview? If an individual is say part Maori and say part Chinese does that individual’s Chinese culture heritage have as much importance as their Maori cultural heritage? Should we be imposing a specific cultural worldview that may not in fact be the culture of any children’s family in a particular school? Presumably you understand that this law gives school’s a choice right? Why do you view this as a bad thing unless the true goal is cultural indoctrination and control. So many questions…

Leave a Reply

What others say

The Learning Environments Australasia Executive Committee  has received a lot of positive feedback, which is greatly due to your wealth of knowledge and information you imparted on our large audience, your presentation has inspired a range of educators, architects and facility planners and for this we are grateful.

Daniel Smith Chair Learning Environments Australasia

Derek and Maurie complement each other well and have the same drive and passion for a future education system that is so worthwhile being part of. Their presentation and facilitation is at the same time friendly and personal while still incredibly professional. I am truly grateful to have had this experience alongside amazing passionate educators and am inspired to re visit all aspects of my leadership. I have a renewed passion for our work as educational leaders.

Karyn Gray Principal, Raphael House Rudolf Steiner

I was in desperate need of a programme like this. This gave me the opportunity to participate in a transformative journey of professional learning and wellbeing, where I rediscovered my passion, reignited my purpose, and reconnected with my vision for leading in education. Together, we got to nurture not just academic excellence, but also the holistic wellbeing of our school communities. Because when we thrive, so does the entire educational ecosystem.

Tara Quinney Principal, St Peter's College, Gore

Refresh, Reconnect, Refocus is the perfect title for this professional development. It does just that. A fantastic retreat, space to think, relax and start to reconnect. Derek and Maurie deliver a balance of knowledge and questioning that gives you time to think about your leadership and where to next. Both facilitators have the experience, understanding, connection and passion for education, this has inspired me to really look at the why for me!

Jan McDonald Principal, Birkdale North School

Engaged, passionate, well informed facilitators who seamlessly worked together to deliver and outstanding programme of thought provoking leadership learning.

Dyane Stokes Principal, Paparoa Street School

A useful and timely call to action. A great chance to slow down, reflect on what really drives you, and refocus on how to get there. Wonderful conversations, great connections, positive pathways forward.

Ursula Cunningham Principal, Amesbury School

RRR is a standout for quality professional learning for Principals. Having been an education PLD junkie for 40 years I have never before attended a programme that has challenged me as much because of its rigor, has satisfied me as much because of its depth or excited me as much because of realising my capacity to lead change. Derek and Maurie are truly inspiring pedagogical, authentic leadership experts who generously and expertly share their passion, wisdom and skills to help Principal's to focus on what is important in schools and be the best leader they can be.

Cindy Sullivan Principal, Kaipara College

Derek Wenmoth is brilliant. Derek connects powerful ideas forecasting the future of learning to re-imagine education and create resources for future-focused practices and policies to drive change. His work provides guidance and tools for shifting to new learning ecosystems through innovations with a focus on purpose, equity, learner agency, and lifelong learning. His work is comprehensive and brings together research and best practices to advance the future of teaching and learning.  His passion, commitment to innovation for equity and the range of practical, policy and strategic advice are exceptional.

Susan Patrick, CEO, Aurora Institute

I asked Derek to work with our teachers to reenergise our team back into our journey towards our vision after the two years of being in and out of 'Covid-ness'.  Teachers reported positively about the day with Derek, commenting on how affirmed they felt that our vision is future focused.  Teachers expressed excitement with their new learning towards the vision, and I've noticed a palpable energy since the day.  Derek also started preparing our thinking for hybrid learning, helping us all to feel a sense of creativity rather than uncertainty.  The leadership team is keen to see him return!

Kate Christie | Principal | Cashmere Ave School

Derek has supported, informed and inspired a core group of our teachers to be effective leads in our college for NPDL. Derek’s PLD is expertly targeted to our needs.

Marion Lumley | Deputy Principal |Ōtaki College

What a task we set Derek -  to facilitate a shared vision and strategy with our Board and the professional and admin teams (14 of us), during a Covid lockdown, using online technology. Derek’s expertise, skilled questioning, strategic facilitation and humour enabled us to work with creative energy for 6 hours using a range of well-timed online activities. He kept us focussed on creating and achieving a shared understanding of our future strategic plan.  Derek’s future focussed skills combined with an understanding of strategy and the education sector made our follow up conversations invaluable.  Furthermore, we will definitely look to engage Derek for future strategic planning work.

Sue Vaealiki, Chair of Stonefields Collaborative Trust 

Our Principal PLG has worked with Derek several times now, and will continue to do so. Derek is essentially a master facilitator/mentor...bringing the right level of challenge, new ideas & research to deepen your thinking, but it comes with the level of support needed to feel engaged, enriched and empowered after working with him.

Gareth Sinton, Principal, Douglas Park School

Derek is a highly knowledgeable and inspirational professional learning provider that has been guiding our staff in the development of New Pedagogies’ for Deep Learning. His ability to gauge where staff are at and use this to guide next steps has been critical in seeing staff buy into this processes and have a strong desire to build in their professional practice.

Andy Fraser, Principal, Otaki College

Discover more from FUTUREMAKERS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading