This week I had the privilege of attending an event in Auckland where Minister of Education, Nikki Kaye, officially released the final draft of the Digital Technologies-Hangarau Matihiko Curriculum for consultation. The event was opened with a group of students from the Lynfield College Robotics club who gave an outstanding presentation about their work as a team to design and develop robots which they have been entering into various competitions since 2008 – winning multiple national and international titles in that time!
One by one the group of year 11 – year 13 students gave their perspective on what contributed to the team’s success – the key takeaways from my notes included:
- this is a team effort, requiring the most sophisticated levels of collaboration to succeed
- the team requires a diverse mix of skills, including coders, engineers, web designers, communications specialists, designers etc.
- this provides the context for deep, authentic engagement in learning in a truly cross-curricular manner
- the skills they are learning through this process are transferrable, equipping them fully for an ever changing world once they leave school
- the entire process is essentially student driven
- there is a lot of peer mentoring involved – the team changes each year as older students move out and younger ones join, so the continuity of the team culture is evolved and maintained through this internal coaching and mentoring process
One thing struck me the most – and was emphasised to those in the audience as a central challenge…
- all of this is done outside of the regular school hours – after school, before school and in the weekends – the challenge being, imagine just how engaging and more likely to achieve the goals of the NZ Curriculum it would be if this sort of learning was what students across NZ had access to in the context of the regular school day?
It appeared to be a difficult challenge to respond to – on the one hand I noticed a wave of agreement with the sentiment being expressed by these young people, then, as the day progressed, concerns about the impact on other subjects, the demands on school facilities and resources, and the lack of teachers with specialist skills and knowledge to support this sort of thing emerged as reasons why such an approach may not work in all contexts.
And so these students set the scene for what was a really interesting day, as leaders from the education community discussed and responded to the details of the announcement about the new Digital Technologies Curriculum/Hangarau Matahiko. In her address Minister Kaye described the release of this curriculum as the most significant ‘shake-up’ in our education system for many years – reflecting her belief that this move is about more than simply adding yet another area to be addressed into the existing curriculum, but instead, working to introduce into the broader context of our curriculum an emphasis on digital technologies that reflects the nature of the world our young people are going to be living and working in into the future.
There were many on the room who were strongly in support here, including Ian Taylor, fresh back from the America’s Cup where his company, ARL has been responsible for the incredible on-screen graphics that we’ve become so familiar with as we watch the live action. Ian and others spoke of the urgency around introducing digital technologies into the curriculum, while others lamented the stresses felt by principals and teachers to keep up with all of this, and to find space in an already over-crowded curriculum for yet another area to be taught.
In the discussion at one table I was at a teacher was concerned that in her school the technology classes were given a lesser number of hours in the timetable that other subjects such as maths, English or science. She was keen to see more mandates coming from central government to require schools to give more hours in their timetable to this subject.
While I am empathetic to her sense of injustice based on the fact that this is the dilemma most schools will face given the way they currently organise their curriculum and subject lines in the timetable, I simply don’t agree with where this argument would lead – inevitably it would become a case of shuffling things around so that someone else would miss out!
Firstly, I believe that centrally mandating that schools give extra time to this new curriculum is the last thing we should consider, (a) because we already have the freedom and flexibility to make decisions about how time is used and allocated in our schools and mandating such things removes yet more agency from school leaders, and (b) considering the implementation to be counted in terms of hours to be allocated seems to be missing the point entirely of what this curriculum is about – or at least, how it should be implemented.
For me the lesson lies so explicitly in the message we had from the Lynfield College students – make this sort of experience a central plank of all learning, and work towards taking a far more integrated and trans-disciplinary approach. Instead of isolating these subjects into their own lines on a curriculum, each competing for hours on the timetable, work to create new ways of identifying and addressing the opportunities for learning in and across disciplines in the manner in which the Robotics team did at the beginning of our day.
Like Nikki Kaye I believe this curriculum could herald a ‘shake-up’ in education – but the experience will vary. For some it will mean shaking up the way in which learning occurs, with teachers and students working in trans-disciplinary teams on engaging and authentic challenges, whole for others the shake-up will occur only at the level of “shifting the deck chairs on the timetable” and discipline-based experts competing for the attention of the same students for their classes.
I’m for the former – but it’s going to require a lot of courage, commitment and partnership across a wide range of stakeholders! This simply isn’t going to work if it is received as yet another curriculum area we need to find space for.
7 thoughts on “A shake-up for education?”
I agree with you completely Derek. We are getting closer to the dream of breaking down silos of subject led education. I think that as well as the PLD for teachers and leaders there is a real need to up skill agencies like NZQA,ERO,Unions etc. I found also when I was back as HoD Technology that there were a lot of Achievement Standards that were similar across our disciplines but there was no thought of collaboration on these standards (very sad). A coordinated approach is needed.
Rewrite the standards to allow collaboration, up skill the Govt agencies to help drive the change, include parents and Whanau with the information they need to understand the changes needed and why. Include the students in the change process. I am excited but also cautious about the opportunity. Why I am cautious is that I know that the agencies that could supprt the changes struggle with the understanding and reasons for the changes needed.
So to reflect it needs not just PLD and focus on the kura and schools but needs a coordinated approach across many orginisations and people.
Wow that is something I could get my teeth into.
Haven’t felt this excited in awhile.
Good luck my mate.
Hi Eddie – thanks for the support – love your enthusiasm!
I am with you completely Derek. Authentic learning, big picture, multi disciplinary and following learner’s passions. We can do this. But we need brave leadership to take parents, communities and teachers with us.
thanks Marg – agree, partnerships are key!
Interesting post Derek. So where does online learning fit in an integrated curriculum? In NZ it currently largely reinforces subject silos. I have my own thoughts on this, but interested in yours…
interesting posts. thanks
I agree with you completely Derek. We are getting closer to the dream of breaking down silos of subject led education. I think that as well as the PLD for teachers and leaders there is a real need to up skill agencies like NZQA,ERO,Unions etc.